8.7.2026 ADSL-9 Moumita Court No. 29 CRR 2318 of 2026 Alla Rakha Sk Vs. State of West Bengal Mr. Prabir Majumder, Adv. Mr. Snehansu Majumder, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Anindita Kundu, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Subir Ganguly, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw, Adv. …For the States 1. In this instant application the petitioner has assailed the order dated 7.10.2023 passed in NDPS Case No. 57 of 2014 by learned Judge Special court under NDPS Act at Krishnagar. 2. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a day labour, therefore he works at different places of the state and as such he could not make communication with his learned counsel to know about the status of the instant case. 3. Thereafter, when he made contact with his lawyer, he came to know that by the impugned order, warrant of arrest has been issued against him due to his non-appearance before the Court. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be given liberty so that, he may surrender before the Court below. 2

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, CRR 2318 of 2026 is hereby disposed of given liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the Court below on 18th July, 2026 and in the event of such surrender by the petitioner, the Court below will dispose of his prayer in accordance with law. The warrant of arrest issued by the Court vide order dated 7th October, 2023 is hereby stayed till 18th of July 2026. (Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

8.7.2026 ADSL-9 Moumita Court No. 29 CRR 2318 of 2026 Alla Rakha Sk Vs. State of West Bengal Mr. Prabir Majumder, Adv. Mr. Snehansu Majumder, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Anindita Kundu, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Subir Ganguly, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw, Adv. …For the States 1. In this instant application the petitioner has assailed the order dated 7.10.2023 passed in NDPS Case No. 57 of 2014 by learned Judge Special court under NDPS Act at Krishnagar. 2. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a day labour, therefore he works at different places of the state and as such he could not make communication with his learned counsel to know about the status of the instant case. 3. Thereafter, when he made contact with his lawyer, he came to know that by the impugned order, warrant of arrest has been issued against him due to his non-appearance before the Court. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be given liberty so that, he may surrender before the Court below. 2

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, CRR 2318 of 2026 is hereby disposed of given liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the Court below on 18th July, 2026 and in the event of such surrender by the petitioner, the Court below will dispose of his prayer in accordance with law. The warrant of arrest issued by the Court vide order dated 7th October, 2023 is hereby stayed till 18th of July 2026. (Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)