02.02. 08.07.2026 (D/L)(D/L) CT.CT. NO.NO. 0505 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 65 OF 2026 SMT. DULU BARIK VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Sanjib Das, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Kumari, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Suryaneel Das, AGP Mr. Chiranjit Pal, Adv. …For the State Ms. Priti Burman, Adv. …For the Private Respondents 1. Matter has come up in the list under the heading “To Be Mentioned” on being mentioned by the learned advocate representing the petitioner. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner on instruction submits that petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter and in support of same a letter dated 24th June, 2026 is placed before this Court and same is taken on record. 3. State respondents and respondent nos.6 to 16 are represented by learned advocates. 4. In view of aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

02.02. 08.07.2026 (D/L)(D/L) CT.CT. NO.NO. 0505 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 65 OF 2026 SMT. DULU BARIK VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Sanjib Das, Adv. Ms. Sandhya Kumari, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Suryaneel Das, AGP Mr. Chiranjit Pal, Adv. …For the State Ms. Priti Burman, Adv. …For the Private Respondents 1. Matter has come up in the list under the heading “To Be Mentioned” on being mentioned by the learned advocate representing the petitioner. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner on instruction submits that petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter and in support of same a letter dated 24th June, 2026 is placed before this Court and same is taken on record. 3. State respondents and respondent nos.6 to 16 are represented by learned advocates. 4. In view of aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)