07.07.2026 Sl. No.38 Court No.7 Susanta CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (NDPS) 313 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 filed in connection with NJP GRPS Case No. 67 of 2025 dated 22.09.2025 of the NDPS Act, 1985. In Re : Ashu Anuragi … Petitioner. Ms. Rima Sarkar, … for the Petitioner. Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Ld. APP Mr. Atul Dong … for the State. 1. The petitioner is in custody for 300 days. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is 19 years old student. No amount of contraband was found from the possession of the petitioner. He was working in a train from where the contraband articles were seized. The contraband was found in Coach B-4 and he was working in Coach B-2. 3. The other co-accused are also the employees of the train. The petitioner has been wrongly framed. There is absolutely no nexus of the petitioner with the offence that has been committed. 4. The petitioner is nowhere related with the crime as will be evident from the police report of the Investigating Officer dated 26th September, 2025. 5. Prayer has been made to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. The aforesaid prayer of the petitioner is strongly opposed by the learned counsel representing the State. 2 7. It has been submitted that the petitioner was in conscious possession of the contraband. All statutory formalities have been complied with.

8. Upon hearing the submission made on behalf of both the parties and in view of the fact that commercial quantity of contraband was recovered from the joint possession of all the co-accused, accordingly, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 9. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. 10. The learned Trial Court is directed to take up the trial and try to conclude the same as expeditiously as possible. 11. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 12. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)

07.07.2026 Sl. No.38 Court No.7 Susanta CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (NDPS) 313 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 filed in connection with NJP GRPS Case No. 67 of 2025 dated 22.09.2025 of the NDPS Act, 1985. In Re : Ashu Anuragi … Petitioner. Ms. Rima Sarkar, … for the Petitioner. Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Ld. APP Mr. Atul Dong … for the State. 1. The petitioner is in custody for 300 days. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is 19 years old student. No amount of contraband was found from the possession of the petitioner. He was working in a train from where the contraband articles were seized. The contraband was found in Coach B-4 and he was working in Coach B-2. 3. The other co-accused are also the employees of the train. The petitioner has been wrongly framed. There is absolutely no nexus of the petitioner with the offence that has been committed. 4. The petitioner is nowhere related with the crime as will be evident from the police report of the Investigating Officer dated 26th September, 2025. 5. Prayer has been made to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. The aforesaid prayer of the petitioner is strongly opposed by the learned counsel representing the State. 2 7. It has been submitted that the petitioner was in conscious possession of the contraband. All statutory formalities have been complied with.

8. Upon hearing the submission made on behalf of both the parties and in view of the fact that commercial quantity of contraband was recovered from the joint possession of all the co-accused, accordingly, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 9. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. 10. The learned Trial Court is directed to take up the trial and try to conclude the same as expeditiously as possible. 11. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 12. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)