03.07.2026 M/L No.12 Court No.12 (gc) CPAN 292 of 2024 In WPA 9119 of 2022 Kazi Firoja Begum & Ors. Vs. Mrs. Manasi Ghosh & Anr. Mr. Sani Hossain, Ms. Salma Sultana Shah, Mr. Miraj Hossain …for the Applicants. 1. Despite service, none appears for the alleged contemnors. 2. The contempt application is disposed of, upon recording that the alleged contemnor was wrongly impleaded in the proceeding. The writ petition was filed on an incorrect premise that, the area on which the unauthorized construction had been made, fell within Haripal Sahadev gram panchayat. The Pradhan has informed the applicant that, Sipaigachi Mouza, was not within the jurisdiction of Haripal Sahadev gram panchayat. 3. Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of. 4. The contempt proceeding is dropped. 5. The applicant will be at liberty to take appropriate steps afresh, with all his allegations. 6. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)

03.07.2026 M/L No.12 Court No.12 (gc) CPAN 292 of 2024 In WPA 9119 of 2022 Kazi Firoja Begum & Ors. Vs. Mrs. Manasi Ghosh & Anr. Mr. Sani Hossain, Ms. Salma Sultana Shah, Mr. Miraj Hossain …for the Applicants. 1. Despite service, none appears for the alleged contemnors. 2. The contempt application is disposed of, upon recording that the alleged contemnor was wrongly impleaded in the proceeding. The writ petition was filed on an incorrect premise that, the area on which the unauthorized construction had been made, fell within Haripal Sahadev gram panchayat. The Pradhan has informed the applicant that, Sipaigachi Mouza, was not within the jurisdiction of Haripal Sahadev gram panchayat. 3. Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of. 4. The contempt proceeding is dropped. 5. The applicant will be at liberty to take appropriate steps afresh, with all his allegations. 6. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)