02.07.2026 Serial no. 231 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 1022 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Nandakumar PS Case No. 202 of 2025 dated 21.04.2025 u/s 126(2)/118(2)/109/103(1)/351(2)/61(2) of the BNS, GR No. 1133 of 2025. -And- In the matter of : Srinivas Das @ Srinibas Das … Petitioner(s) Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than one year two months and charges have already been framed. According to the learned advocate, some of the accused persons are on bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the complicity of Motilal Das and Pratima Das who are on bail. Having regard to the same, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is similarly situated as the other accused persons who have been enlarged on bail, as such, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the same terms and conditions as was imposed upon Motilal Das in CRM (M) 310 of 2026. 2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner [Srinivas Das @ Srinibas Das] is Allowed. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1022 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

02.07.2026 Serial no. 231 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 1022 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Nandakumar PS Case No. 202 of 2025 dated 21.04.2025 u/s 126(2)/118(2)/109/103(1)/351(2)/61(2) of the BNS, GR No. 1133 of 2025. -And- In the matter of : Srinivas Das @ Srinibas Das … Petitioner(s) Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than one year two months and charges have already been framed. According to the learned advocate, some of the accused persons are on bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the complicity of Motilal Das and Pratima Das who are on bail. Having regard to the same, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is similarly situated as the other accused persons who have been enlarged on bail, as such, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the same terms and conditions as was imposed upon Motilal Das in CRM (M) 310 of 2026. 2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner [Srinivas Das @ Srinibas Das] is Allowed. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1022 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)