24.06.2026 Ct. No.5 Sl. No.50 akd W. P. A. 13488 of 2026 (C. A. N. 1 of 2026) [not in file] [Vedant Jain & Anr. -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.] Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury Mr. Mayukh Mukherjee Ms. Rajkumari Priyanka Devi Ms. Shaghika Banerjee Mr. Subhamoy Dutta … … for the petitioners Mr. Suryaneel Das .. ld. A.G.P. Mr. Partha Chakraborty … … for the State Mr. Sourav Chatterjee .. Sr. Advocate Mr. Karan Dudhwala Md. Zeeshanuz Zaman Mr. Iswar Das … … for the applicant [in CAN 1 of 2026] 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. 2. At the time of call, learned Advocate representing the petitioners submits that petitioners do not want to press this writ petition. 3. State-respondents are represented by learned Advocate. 4. In view of submission made on behalf of the petitioners, writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. 5. Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, learned Senior Advocate representing the applicant in CAN 1 of 2026 submits that applicant filed an impleadment application. However, in view of the order passed in the writ petition, present application being CAN 1 of 2026 stands dismissed. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 7. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

24.06.2026 Ct. No.5 Sl. No.50 akd W. P. A. 13488 of 2026 (C. A. N. 1 of 2026) [not in file] [Vedant Jain & Anr. -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.] Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury Mr. Mayukh Mukherjee Ms. Rajkumari Priyanka Devi Ms. Shaghika Banerjee Mr. Subhamoy Dutta … … for the petitioners Mr. Suryaneel Das .. ld. A.G.P. Mr. Partha Chakraborty … … for the State Mr. Sourav Chatterjee .. Sr. Advocate Mr. Karan Dudhwala Md. Zeeshanuz Zaman Mr. Iswar Das … … for the applicant [in CAN 1 of 2026] 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. 2. At the time of call, learned Advocate representing the petitioners submits that petitioners do not want to press this writ petition. 3. State-respondents are represented by learned Advocate. 4. In view of submission made on behalf of the petitioners, writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. 5. Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, learned Senior Advocate representing the applicant in CAN 1 of 2026 submits that applicant filed an impleadment application. However, in view of the order passed in the writ petition, present application being CAN 1 of 2026 stands dismissed. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 7. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)