24.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.76 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 954 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Malda Town GRPS Police Station Case No. 27 of 2025 dated 31.03.2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. And In Re : Md. Basir ... Petitioner. Md. Wasim Akram, Ms. Sabrina Parveen ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Saha, Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there has been alleged recovery of 337 grams of Brown Sugar and 438 grams of Yaba tablets. Petitioner is in custody for 1 year 3 months and till date, only one witness has been examined, although prosecution has relied upon 17 witnesses in support of its case. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that prosecution intends to examine 14 witnesses. Having considered the quantum of recovery in the present case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner has failed to overcome the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 954 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. 2 All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

24.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.76 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 954 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Malda Town GRPS Police Station Case No. 27 of 2025 dated 31.03.2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. And In Re : Md. Basir ... Petitioner. Md. Wasim Akram, Ms. Sabrina Parveen ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Saha, Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there has been alleged recovery of 337 grams of Brown Sugar and 438 grams of Yaba tablets. Petitioner is in custody for 1 year 3 months and till date, only one witness has been examined, although prosecution has relied upon 17 witnesses in support of its case. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that prosecution intends to examine 14 witnesses. Having considered the quantum of recovery in the present case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner has failed to overcome the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 954 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. 2 All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)