18.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.92 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 828 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 274 of 2023 dated 29.04.2023 under Sections 340/323/376DA/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. And In Re : Sanowar Hossain @ Sanowar Malitha @ Sanuyar Hossain ... Petitioner. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee, Mr. Anisur Rahman, Mr. Ankusha Ghosh ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, APP, Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya ... For the State. Mr. Maidul Islam Kayal, Mr. Archishman Singh, Mr. Mohinur Mullick ... For the de facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about 3 years 2 months and the evidence of the victim has been completed. Attention of the Court was drawn to the evidence of the victim and prayer for bail was advanced before this Court. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant leaves the issue relating to bail to the discretion of this Court. 2

I have taken into account the period of detention of the present petitioner. Having regard to the fact that evidence of the victim is over, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail considering the time period which has been consumed. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Sanowar Hossain @ Sanowar Malitha @ Sanuyar Hossain shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under the POCSO Act, Berhampore, Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date so fixed by the learned Special Court. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 828 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

18.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.92 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 828 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 274 of 2023 dated 29.04.2023 under Sections 340/323/376DA/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. And In Re : Sanowar Hossain @ Sanowar Malitha @ Sanuyar Hossain ... Petitioner. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee, Mr. Anisur Rahman, Mr. Ankusha Ghosh ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, APP, Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya ... For the State. Mr. Maidul Islam Kayal, Mr. Archishman Singh, Mr. Mohinur Mullick ... For the de facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about 3 years 2 months and the evidence of the victim has been completed. Attention of the Court was drawn to the evidence of the victim and prayer for bail was advanced before this Court. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant leaves the issue relating to bail to the discretion of this Court. 2

I have taken into account the period of detention of the present petitioner. Having regard to the fact that evidence of the victim is over, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail considering the time period which has been consumed. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Sanowar Hossain @ Sanowar Malitha @ Sanuyar Hossain shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under the POCSO Act, Berhampore, Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date so fixed by the learned Special Court. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 828 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)