29.05.2026 Sl. No. 46 Ct. No. 7 SG [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (M) 1323 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 03(04) 2014 arising out of Ekbalpore Police Station Case No. 78 of 2012 dated 11.03.2012 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act (G.R. Case No. 1044 of 2012). And In Re: Md. Zahid. … … Petitioner Mr. Joy Chakraborty, Mr. Sandip Dinda. … … for the petitioner Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi. … … for the State 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is in custody for 14 years and he seeks parity with the co-accused, who have been granted bail. 2. Learned Counsel for the State opposed the bail prayer and contended that only one more witness requires to be examined and as such, if the petitioner is released on bail, there is serious chance of his abscondence, which will cause delay in disposal of the case. 3. Considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner and that the co-accused persons are already on bail and that the evidence of material witnesses have already been recorded by the Court below, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2

4. The petitioner, namely, Md. Zahid is granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, one of whom must be local, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. The trial court shall be at liberty to impose any further condition to secure the attendance of the petitioner during trial. 5. The application for bail being CRM (M) 1323 of 2026 is, thus, disposed of. (Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

29.05.2026 Sl. No. 46 Ct. No. 7 SG [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (M) 1323 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 03(04) 2014 arising out of Ekbalpore Police Station Case No. 78 of 2012 dated 11.03.2012 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act (G.R. Case No. 1044 of 2012). And In Re: Md. Zahid. … … Petitioner Mr. Joy Chakraborty, Mr. Sandip Dinda. … … for the petitioner Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi. … … for the State 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is in custody for 14 years and he seeks parity with the co-accused, who have been granted bail. 2. Learned Counsel for the State opposed the bail prayer and contended that only one more witness requires to be examined and as such, if the petitioner is released on bail, there is serious chance of his abscondence, which will cause delay in disposal of the case. 3. Considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner and that the co-accused persons are already on bail and that the evidence of material witnesses have already been recorded by the Court below, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2

4. The petitioner, namely, Md. Zahid is granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, one of whom must be local, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. The trial court shall be at liberty to impose any further condition to secure the attendance of the petitioner during trial. 5. The application for bail being CRM (M) 1323 of 2026 is, thus, disposed of. (Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)