Digitally signed by PRAJAKTA 305-IA 3690-24.DOC SAGARPRAJAKTA VARTAKSAGAR VARTAK Date:2026.09.21 11:46:18 +0530 Prajakta Vartak IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3690 OF 2024 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO. 29741 OF 2024 Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant/Applicant Versus Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) ...Respondent _________ Mr. Madhur Agarwal i/b. Mint And Confreres for Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Abhishek Mishra for Respondent. __________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE: 18 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties on this interim application, which has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the aforesaid appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The delay sought to be condoned is of one (1) day. There is no written opposition to the application on behalf of the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly states that the application is not opposed. 2. Considering the period of delay, the same is required to be condoned. Hence, the delay is condoned. 3. The application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim application stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. 4. Let the office objections, if any, be removed within a period of 8 weeks from today. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Page 1 of 1 18 September 2026

Digitally signed by PRAJAKTA 305-IA 3690-24.DOC SAGARPRAJAKTA VARTAKSAGAR VARTAK Date:2026.09.21 11:46:18 +0530 Prajakta Vartak IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3690 OF 2024 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO. 29741 OF 2024 Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. ...Appellant/Applicant Versus Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) ...Respondent _________ Mr. Madhur Agarwal i/b. Mint And Confreres for Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Abhishek Mishra for Respondent. __________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE: 18 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties on this interim application, which has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the aforesaid appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The delay sought to be condoned is of one (1) day. There is no written opposition to the application on behalf of the respondent. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly states that the application is not opposed. 2. Considering the period of delay, the same is required to be condoned. Hence, the delay is condoned. 3. The application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim application stands disposed of in the above terms. No costs. 4. Let the office objections, if any, be removed within a period of 8 weeks from today. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Page 1 of 1 18 September 2026