21-APEAL-1651-2011 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. APPEAL NO. 1651 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1648 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1649 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1652 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1653 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH Arjun 1 21-APEAL-1651-2011 (CR).docx CR. APPEAL NO. 1654 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1655 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents —————— Mr. Siyal Magdum i/b Umesh Manakapure, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Rahul Rote, i/b Vijay Killedar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. C. D. Mali, APP for the Respondent – State. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 17th September 2026. PER COURT :

1. Heard Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant, Mr. Rahul Rote, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 and Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP for the Respondent – State. 2. Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant, submits that the subject matter of these Appeals is settled and he has instructions from the Appellant in these Appeals to withdraw the same. Arjun 2 21-APEAL-1651-2011 (CR).docx 3. Mr. Rahul Rote, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, confirms the statement made by Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant. 4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Appeal. 5. Criminal Appeal Nos. 1651 of 2011, 1648 of 2011, 1649 of 2011, 1652 of 2011, 1653 of 2011, 1654 of 2011 and 1655 of 2011, are disposed of as withdrawn. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] Digitally signed by ARJUN ARJUN KRISHNA KRISHNA RODGE RODGE Date: 2026.09.21 11:17:05 +0530 Arjun 3

21-APEAL-1651-2011 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. APPEAL NO. 1651 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1648 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1649 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1652 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1653 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH Arjun 1 21-APEAL-1651-2011 (CR).docx CR. APPEAL NO. 1654 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents WITH CR. APPEAL NO. 1655 OF 2011 Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd … Appellant Versus Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr. … Respondents —————— Mr. Siyal Magdum i/b Umesh Manakapure, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Rahul Rote, i/b Vijay Killedar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. C. D. Mali, APP for the Respondent – State. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 17th September 2026. PER COURT :

1. Heard Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant, Mr. Rahul Rote, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 and Mr. C. D. Mali, learned APP for the Respondent – State. 2. Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant, submits that the subject matter of these Appeals is settled and he has instructions from the Appellant in these Appeals to withdraw the same. Arjun 2 21-APEAL-1651-2011 (CR).docx 3. Mr. Rahul Rote, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, confirms the statement made by Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant. 4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Appeal. 5. Criminal Appeal Nos. 1651 of 2011, 1648 of 2011, 1649 of 2011, 1652 of 2011, 1653 of 2011, 1654 of 2011 and 1655 of 2011, are disposed of as withdrawn. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] Digitally signed by ARJUN ARJUN KRISHNA KRISHNA RODGE RODGE Date: 2026.09.21 11:17:05 +0530 Arjun 3