2026:BHC-AUG:42300 1 76-WP-4543-98.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4543 OF 1998 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13151 OF 2024 IN WP/4543/1998 YADULLA BABUSAB AND OTHERS VERSUS SK.AHMADULLA KHAN SIDDI KHAJA MOINUDDIN AND OTHERS. … Advocate for Respondent No.1-B: Mr. Umakant B. Deshmukh AGP for Respondents No.7 and 8 : Mr. P. D. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.9/1 to 5 : Mr. K. M. Nagarkar … CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 15-09-2026 PER COURT:- 1. This Court, on 26.03.2026 and 29.06.2026, passed the following orders; “1. None present for petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that even on last occasion none was present for the petitioner. 2. Considering the same, list the matter for dismissal on 22.04.2026.” AND “1. None present for the petitioners when the matter was called in morning session. In afternoon session also, when matter was called out, none appeared. 2. List this petition on 13.07.2026 for dismissal.” 2. A subsequent request made on behalf of the petitioners was acceded to on 13.07.2026, however, no one appeared for them even today. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of for want of prosecution. Rule stands discharged accordingly. 4. Pending civil applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.] rrd

2026:BHC-AUG:42300 1 76-WP-4543-98.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4543 OF 1998 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13151 OF 2024 IN WP/4543/1998 YADULLA BABUSAB AND OTHERS VERSUS SK.AHMADULLA KHAN SIDDI KHAJA MOINUDDIN AND OTHERS. … Advocate for Respondent No.1-B: Mr. Umakant B. Deshmukh AGP for Respondents No.7 and 8 : Mr. P. D. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.9/1 to 5 : Mr. K. M. Nagarkar … CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 15-09-2026 PER COURT:- 1. This Court, on 26.03.2026 and 29.06.2026, passed the following orders; “1. None present for petitioner. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that even on last occasion none was present for the petitioner. 2. Considering the same, list the matter for dismissal on 22.04.2026.” AND “1. None present for the petitioners when the matter was called in morning session. In afternoon session also, when matter was called out, none appeared. 2. List this petition on 13.07.2026 for dismissal.” 2. A subsequent request made on behalf of the petitioners was acceded to on 13.07.2026, however, no one appeared for them even today. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of for want of prosecution. Rule stands discharged accordingly. 4. Pending civil applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.] rrd