2026:BHC-AUG:42201 1 936 CA 10591 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10591 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/21796/2026 BABU RANGA MORE (DIED) THR LRS ATMARAM AND ORS VERSUS THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER PACHORA DIV. PACHORA DIST JALGAON ... Ms. M. S. Andhare h/f. Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 – State Mr. G. S. Khaire h/f. Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No.1 … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATED : 11th September 2026 P.C. :- . This Civil Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 324 days caused in filing the cross-objection. 2. The delay is well explained in paragraph Nos.2 to 6 of the application. Considering that the main First Appeal filed by the acquiring body is pending in this Court and is already admitted, the delay deserves to be condoned. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 324 days caused in filing the cross-objection stands condoned. 2 936 CA 10591 OF 2026 4. The applicants shall remove all the office objections within a period of four weeks from today. If the objections are not removed within stipulated period, this order shall automatically lose its effect. 5. Suffice to note, in the event the cross objection is allowed, the applicants shall not be entitled for interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) PRW

2026:BHC-AUG:42201 1 936 CA 10591 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10591 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/21796/2026 BABU RANGA MORE (DIED) THR LRS ATMARAM AND ORS VERSUS THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER PACHORA DIV. PACHORA DIST JALGAON ... Ms. M. S. Andhare h/f. Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 – State Mr. G. S. Khaire h/f. Mr. S. S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No.1 … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATED : 11th September 2026 P.C. :- . This Civil Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 324 days caused in filing the cross-objection. 2. The delay is well explained in paragraph Nos.2 to 6 of the application. Considering that the main First Appeal filed by the acquiring body is pending in this Court and is already admitted, the delay deserves to be condoned. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 324 days caused in filing the cross-objection stands condoned. 2 936 CA 10591 OF 2026 4. The applicants shall remove all the office objections within a period of four weeks from today. If the objections are not removed within stipulated period, this order shall automatically lose its effect. 5. Suffice to note, in the event the cross objection is allowed, the applicants shall not be entitled for interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) PRW