3-WP-3183-2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3183 OF 2016 Vivek Atmaram Keluskar & Anr. .....Petitioners Versus Rashmi Rajesh Sawardekar & Anr. .....Respondents ..... None for the Petitioners. Mr. Kumar V. Saste, A.P.P, for the Respondent-State. PSI R.D.Shendge attached to Virar Police Station, present. ..… CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, J. DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.:- 1. The present petition is filed for quashing of CR No. I-159 of 2016 registered with the respondent No. 1 for the offence punishable under Section 420 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. None remained present for the petitioner when the matter was called in the morning session. None remained present for the petitioner when the matter was kept back and was called in the second session. 3. The learned APP, Mr. Saste, informs that the charge-sheet is Wakodikar 1/2 Digitally signed RUPALI byRAJESHRUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR WAKODIKAR Date: 2026.09.09 18:15:56 +0530 3-WP-3183-2016.doc filed in this matter, charges are framed, and the trial has commenced. 4. In view of this, the present petition does not survive, it has become infructuous. 5. Hence, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 6. Needless to state that all the contentions of all the parties are kept open and that this Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the matter. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) Wakodikar 2/2

3-WP-3183-2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3183 OF 2016 Vivek Atmaram Keluskar & Anr. .....Petitioners Versus Rashmi Rajesh Sawardekar & Anr. .....Respondents ..... None for the Petitioners. Mr. Kumar V. Saste, A.P.P, for the Respondent-State. PSI R.D.Shendge attached to Virar Police Station, present. ..… CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, J. DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.:- 1. The present petition is filed for quashing of CR No. I-159 of 2016 registered with the respondent No. 1 for the offence punishable under Section 420 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. None remained present for the petitioner when the matter was called in the morning session. None remained present for the petitioner when the matter was kept back and was called in the second session. 3. The learned APP, Mr. Saste, informs that the charge-sheet is Wakodikar 1/2 Digitally signed RUPALI byRAJESHRUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR WAKODIKAR Date: 2026.09.09 18:15:56 +0530 3-WP-3183-2016.doc filed in this matter, charges are framed, and the trial has commenced. 4. In view of this, the present petition does not survive, it has become infructuous. 5. Hence, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 6. Needless to state that all the contentions of all the parties are kept open and that this Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the matter. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) Wakodikar 2/2