2026:BHC-AUG:41111 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2014 IN WP/5547/2013 St. Francis De Sales Education Society And Others Versus J. H. Sahariya And Another __________________________________________________________ Adv. Kadam Vikram S. for the Petitioner Mr. S. J. Salgare, A.G.P. for State Adv. Omkar S. Shendkar h/f. Sr. Adv. Patil Bankar Deelip N. for Respondent No. 2 __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt is complied with. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1

2026:BHC-AUG:41111 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2014 IN WP/5547/2013 St. Francis De Sales Education Society And Others Versus J. H. Sahariya And Another __________________________________________________________ Adv. Kadam Vikram S. for the Petitioner Mr. S. J. Salgare, A.G.P. for State Adv. Omkar S. Shendkar h/f. Sr. Adv. Patil Bankar Deelip N. for Respondent No. 2 __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt is complied with. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1