2026:BHC-AUG:40471 962ba1038-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 962 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1038 OF 2026 Sitaram Ashok Jadhav VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Ms. Sonawane Sunita G., Advocate for the Applicant Ms. Ashlesha S. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 2nd September, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP. With their assistance, I have perused the entire available record. Upon showing disinclination to allow the application, the learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty file fresh application after a period of one year from today, in case the trial does not proceed substantially. 2. Liberty as prayed is granted. The application is disposed of as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 1 of 1

2026:BHC-AUG:40471 962ba1038-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 962 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1038 OF 2026 Sitaram Ashok Jadhav VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Ms. Sonawane Sunita G., Advocate for the Applicant Ms. Ashlesha S. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 2nd September, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP. With their assistance, I have perused the entire available record. Upon showing disinclination to allow the application, the learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty file fresh application after a period of one year from today, in case the trial does not proceed substantially. 2. Liberty as prayed is granted. The application is disposed of as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 1 of 1