2026:BHC-AUG:39620-DB {1} 99 sr.no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 429 OF 2025 Adarsh Education Society Through Its President And Another ….Petitioner VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others …..Respondent ….. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Patil Hanmant V. AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: Mr. S.R. Aakale Advocate for respondent No.3 : Mr. S.R. Bagal h/f. Mr. Vikaram Kadam. CORAM : N.B. SURYAWANSHI & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 31 AUGUST, 2026. P.C.:- Petitioner's proposal for academic year 2024-25 is rejected by the respondents on the ground that the NAAC Accreditation has come to an end on 4.11.2021. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner institution has already received NAAC Accreditation B+ Grade. Though the same is forwarded to the respondents, the respondents have not taken it into consideration. 3. Be that as it may, since the proposal of the petitioner was for {2} 99 sr.no..odt the academic year 2024-25 and now the academic year 2025-26 has commenced, we dispose of the petition by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh proposal for the current academic year. [ABASAHEB D. SHINDE] [N.B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-

2026:BHC-AUG:39620-DB {1} 99 sr.no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 429 OF 2025 Adarsh Education Society Through Its President And Another ….Petitioner VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others …..Respondent ….. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Patil Hanmant V. AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: Mr. S.R. Aakale Advocate for respondent No.3 : Mr. S.R. Bagal h/f. Mr. Vikaram Kadam. CORAM : N.B. SURYAWANSHI & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 31 AUGUST, 2026. P.C.:- Petitioner's proposal for academic year 2024-25 is rejected by the respondents on the ground that the NAAC Accreditation has come to an end on 4.11.2021. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner institution has already received NAAC Accreditation B+ Grade. Though the same is forwarded to the respondents, the respondents have not taken it into consideration. 3. Be that as it may, since the proposal of the petitioner was for {2} 99 sr.no..odt the academic year 2024-25 and now the academic year 2025-26 has commenced, we dispose of the petition by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh proposal for the current academic year. [ABASAHEB D. SHINDE] [N.B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-