18-IA-512-2026 (CR).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 512 OF 2026 IN CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2026 Shivbala Alias Appasaheb Siddhgonda Patil .....Applicant VERSUS Senior Inspector of Police and Another .....Respondents ... Mr. P. P. Pujari, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for Respondent-State. ... CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1. The Applicant has moved this Application seeking restoration of the original Writ Petition No.103 of 2026 to its original file, as the same was dismissed for default. 2. On perusal of the record, it appears that no notice was issued to Respondent No. 2 in the original Writ Petition and only the learned APP appeared for Respondent No.1-State. 3. Moreover, it appears that the Applicant has filed this Application within time and the prayers made therein are innocuous. Therefore, notice to Respondent No. 2 is not required, as he was not present before this Court in the original Writ Petition. Suresh Page 1 of 2 18-IA-512-2026 (CR).odt 4. Having considered the above and the reasons disclosed in the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The Writ Petition be restored to its original number. 5. Writ Petition No.103 of 2026 stand over to 4th September 2026. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Suresh Page 2 of 2

18-IA-512-2026 (CR).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 512 OF 2026 IN CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2026 Shivbala Alias Appasaheb Siddhgonda Patil .....Applicant VERSUS Senior Inspector of Police and Another .....Respondents ... Mr. P. P. Pujari, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for Respondent-State. ... CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1. The Applicant has moved this Application seeking restoration of the original Writ Petition No.103 of 2026 to its original file, as the same was dismissed for default. 2. On perusal of the record, it appears that no notice was issued to Respondent No. 2 in the original Writ Petition and only the learned APP appeared for Respondent No.1-State. 3. Moreover, it appears that the Applicant has filed this Application within time and the prayers made therein are innocuous. Therefore, notice to Respondent No. 2 is not required, as he was not present before this Court in the original Writ Petition. Suresh Page 1 of 2 18-IA-512-2026 (CR).odt 4. Having considered the above and the reasons disclosed in the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). The Writ Petition be restored to its original number. 5. Writ Petition No.103 of 2026 stand over to 4th September 2026. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Suresh Page 2 of 2