2026:BHC-NAG:11146-DB 1 104.wp.5889.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.5889 OF 2026 Ganesh Eknath Meshram .Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Petitioner-in-person Mr A. J. Gohokar, AGP for respondent /State CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATED : 27 th AUGUST, 2026 . Heard petitioner-in-person. 2. The challenge raised in this petition is to the election conducted within the limits of Nagpur Municipal Corporation more particularly Prabhag Nos. 33 & 17. The petitioner also prayed for other reliefs. 3. At the outset, when questioned of maintainability of petition was put to the party in person, he could not point out any provision which would authorize this Court to deal with the matter. 4. Since, in view of Article 243-ZG of the Constitution of India the challenge to the election can be raised through election petition, we are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. [RAJNISH R. VYAS, J] [ANIL S. KILOR, J.] Namrata Signed by: Miss Namrata Suryawanshi Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 27/08/2026 16:49:37

2026:BHC-NAG:11146-DB 1 104.wp.5889.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.5889 OF 2026 Ganesh Eknath Meshram .Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Petitioner-in-person Mr A. J. Gohokar, AGP for respondent /State CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATED : 27 th AUGUST, 2026 . Heard petitioner-in-person. 2. The challenge raised in this petition is to the election conducted within the limits of Nagpur Municipal Corporation more particularly Prabhag Nos. 33 & 17. The petitioner also prayed for other reliefs. 3. At the outset, when questioned of maintainability of petition was put to the party in person, he could not point out any provision which would authorize this Court to deal with the matter. 4. Since, in view of Article 243-ZG of the Constitution of India the challenge to the election can be raised through election petition, we are not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. [RAJNISH R. VYAS, J] [ANIL S. KILOR, J.] Namrata Signed by: Miss Namrata Suryawanshi Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 27/08/2026 16:49:37