Digitally signed by 45-WP-10236-2026.doc RUPALI RUPALI RAJESH RAJESH WAKODIKAR WAKODIKAR Date: 2026.08.28 14:49:22 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10236 OF 2026 Aurum Real Estate Developers Limited ...Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani & Mr. Bhagrati Sahu i/b UBR Legal Advocates for the Petitioner. Ms. Shruti D. Vyas, Addl.G.P a/w Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar, A.G.P for the Respondents-State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL JJ. DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned Addl.G.P Ms. Vyas for the Respondents fairly submits that a notice of personal hearing will be served on the petitioner and on the day fixed, the petitioner shall be duly heard, after which the order will be passed on the appeal which is preferred by the petitioner against the order rejecting the application for refund. Wakodikar 1/2 45-WP-10236-2026.doc 2. In the light of the statement made, nothing survives for further consideration in the petition. 3. Petition is accordingly disposed of. 4. We request the respondent No.2 to hear the appeal within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. 5. It is made clear that this order has been passed limited to the aspect of rejecting the application for refund and we have not considered any other contention of the petitioner. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Wakodikar 2/2

Digitally signed by 45-WP-10236-2026.doc RUPALI RUPALI RAJESH RAJESH WAKODIKAR WAKODIKAR Date: 2026.08.28 14:49:22 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10236 OF 2026 Aurum Real Estate Developers Limited ...Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Bharat Raichandani a/w Mr. Mahesh Raichandani & Mr. Bhagrati Sahu i/b UBR Legal Advocates for the Petitioner. Ms. Shruti D. Vyas, Addl.G.P a/w Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar, A.G.P for the Respondents-State. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL JJ. DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned Addl.G.P Ms. Vyas for the Respondents fairly submits that a notice of personal hearing will be served on the petitioner and on the day fixed, the petitioner shall be duly heard, after which the order will be passed on the appeal which is preferred by the petitioner against the order rejecting the application for refund. Wakodikar 1/2 45-WP-10236-2026.doc 2. In the light of the statement made, nothing survives for further consideration in the petition. 3. Petition is accordingly disposed of. 4. We request the respondent No.2 to hear the appeal within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. 5. It is made clear that this order has been passed limited to the aspect of rejecting the application for refund and we have not considered any other contention of the petitioner. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Wakodikar 2/2