2026:BHC-AUG:39563-DB 1 22-WP-10808-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 22 WRIT PETITION NO. 10808 OF 2026 BHAU ABA SUDRIK AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sanjay N. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. A. D. Aghav, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. Joslyn Menezes, Advocate for Respondent No.6 … WRIT PETITION NO. 10986 OF 2026 RAJU NANA GAIKWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Z. H. Farooqui, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State ... WRIT PETITION NO.10987 OF 2026 LAXMAN CHANGDEO RAKTE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Sandeep V. Kulkarni, Advocate a/w Mr. Kiran M. Nagarkar, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State ... WRIT PETITION NO. 10970 OF 2026 CHANDRAVADAN LAKHAMICHAND GUJARATHI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Amol S. Sawant, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2026 SVH 2 22-WP-10808-26.odt PER COURT : 1. The issue raised in these petitions is squarely covered by the decision of this Court at Principal Seat [Coram : Ravindra V. Ghuge and Abhay J. Mantri, JJ.] dated 18/03/2026, passed in Writ Petition No.15662/2025.

2. For the reasons stated in the said order, the writ petitions are partly allowed with following directions: (a) The petitioners would be entitled for monetary benefits / difference of pensionary benefits as per the actuals w.e.f. from their respective dates of superannuation, provided they have worked for 6 months or more in the last year up to their superannuation. (b) The pensionary benefits of the petitioners would be recalculated by including the annual increment in their last drawn salary prior to their superannuation and such recalculated pensionary benefits shall be payable to them. (c) Arrears if any, shall be paid to them within a period of 90 days. Many of the petitioners have approached belatedly before this Court and, therefore, akin to the orders passed in several matters, they would be not entitled for the interest component. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH

2026:BHC-AUG:39563-DB 1 22-WP-10808-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 22 WRIT PETITION NO. 10808 OF 2026 BHAU ABA SUDRIK AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Sanjay N. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. A. D. Aghav, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. Joslyn Menezes, Advocate for Respondent No.6 … WRIT PETITION NO. 10986 OF 2026 RAJU NANA GAIKWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Z. H. Farooqui, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State ... WRIT PETITION NO.10987 OF 2026 LAXMAN CHANGDEO RAKTE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Sandeep V. Kulkarni, Advocate a/w Mr. Kiran M. Nagarkar, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State ... WRIT PETITION NO. 10970 OF 2026 CHANDRAVADAN LAKHAMICHAND GUJARATHI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Amol S. Sawant, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2026 SVH 2 22-WP-10808-26.odt PER COURT : 1. The issue raised in these petitions is squarely covered by the decision of this Court at Principal Seat [Coram : Ravindra V. Ghuge and Abhay J. Mantri, JJ.] dated 18/03/2026, passed in Writ Petition No.15662/2025.

2. For the reasons stated in the said order, the writ petitions are partly allowed with following directions: (a) The petitioners would be entitled for monetary benefits / difference of pensionary benefits as per the actuals w.e.f. from their respective dates of superannuation, provided they have worked for 6 months or more in the last year up to their superannuation. (b) The pensionary benefits of the petitioners would be recalculated by including the annual increment in their last drawn salary prior to their superannuation and such recalculated pensionary benefits shall be payable to them. (c) Arrears if any, shall be paid to them within a period of 90 days. Many of the petitioners have approached belatedly before this Court and, therefore, akin to the orders passed in several matters, they would be not entitled for the interest component. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH