2026:BHC-NAG:11015-DB (1) 101, 103, 104 & 105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4139 OF 2025 (Sahebrao S/o Lakshman Adkine Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4252 OF 2025 (Swapnil S/o Anandrao Thool Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4272 OF 2025 (Seema D/o Subhash Nagarle Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4281 OF 2025 (Kiran S/o Purushottam Rohankar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. A.S. Tiwari, Advocate for the Petitioner (s) in all writ petitions. Mr. A.V. Palshikar, AGP, for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition Nos.4139 of 2025 & 4272 of 2025. Mr. N.R. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.4252 of 2025. Mr. S.B. Bissa, AGP, for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.4281 of 2025. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 24, 2026. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. We have perused the record and gone through the reliefs sought in the present writ petition. Having regard to the nature of the reliefs sought in the present petition, we find that the grievance raised by the petitioners can appropriately be considered and decided by the Grievance Committee constituted pursuant to the order dated 16.06.2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1775 of 2026. Since the reliefs sought by the petitioners squarely fall within the jurisdiction of the said Committee, we deem it appropriate to relegate the petitioners to avail the said remedy. Accordingly, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the Grievance Committee, which shall MPBalekar (2) 101, 103, 104 & 105 consider and decide the petitioners' grievance, as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law. 3. The writ petitions are, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All contentions of the parties are kept open. 4. In view of disposal of the writ petitions, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) MPBalekar

2026:BHC-NAG:11015-DB (1) 101, 103, 104 & 105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4139 OF 2025 (Sahebrao S/o Lakshman Adkine Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4252 OF 2025 (Swapnil S/o Anandrao Thool Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4272 OF 2025 (Seema D/o Subhash Nagarle Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4281 OF 2025 (Kiran S/o Purushottam Rohankar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. A.S. Tiwari, Advocate for the Petitioner (s) in all writ petitions. Mr. A.V. Palshikar, AGP, for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition Nos.4139 of 2025 & 4272 of 2025. Mr. N.R. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.4252 of 2025. Mr. S.B. Bissa, AGP, for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.4281 of 2025. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 24, 2026. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. We have perused the record and gone through the reliefs sought in the present writ petition. Having regard to the nature of the reliefs sought in the present petition, we find that the grievance raised by the petitioners can appropriately be considered and decided by the Grievance Committee constituted pursuant to the order dated 16.06.2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1775 of 2026. Since the reliefs sought by the petitioners squarely fall within the jurisdiction of the said Committee, we deem it appropriate to relegate the petitioners to avail the said remedy. Accordingly, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the Grievance Committee, which shall MPBalekar (2) 101, 103, 104 & 105 consider and decide the petitioners' grievance, as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law. 3. The writ petitions are, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All contentions of the parties are kept open. 4. In view of disposal of the writ petitions, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) MPBalekar