06-WP-16541-2024.DOC Rekha Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 16541 OF 2024 James @ Sonu Sudhakar Rameiliya …Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 19526 OF 2024 Babu Govind Mahadik And Anr. …Petitioners Versus Union of India and Ors. …Respondent None for the Petitioners in both the Petitions. Mr. Surekh Kumar, for the Respondent. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 24th AUGUST, 2026. PC:- 1. The Petitioners in both the Writ Petitions are absent when the matters were called out. The Petitioners’ Counsel was absent even on the earlier date i.e. on 27th June, 2026, when the Writ Petitions were listed. 2. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents has submitted that the amount which was directed to be paid to the Petitioners by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal has already been deposited before the Tribunal. Therefore, the REKHA Petitioners can make an application to withdraw the amount. PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2026.08.25 11:22:16 +0530 Page 1 of 2 06-WP-16541-2024.DOC 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the Respondent, both the Writ Petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. 4. We make it clear that this order would not come in the way of the Petitioner(s) to make an application before the learned Tribunal for withdrawal of amount, in accordance with law.

(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { Page 2 of 2

06-WP-16541-2024.DOC Rekha Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 16541 OF 2024 James @ Sonu Sudhakar Rameiliya …Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 19526 OF 2024 Babu Govind Mahadik And Anr. …Petitioners Versus Union of India and Ors. …Respondent None for the Petitioners in both the Petitions. Mr. Surekh Kumar, for the Respondent. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 24th AUGUST, 2026. PC:- 1. The Petitioners in both the Writ Petitions are absent when the matters were called out. The Petitioners’ Counsel was absent even on the earlier date i.e. on 27th June, 2026, when the Writ Petitions were listed. 2. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents has submitted that the amount which was directed to be paid to the Petitioners by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal has already been deposited before the Tribunal. Therefore, the REKHA Petitioners can make an application to withdraw the amount. PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2026.08.25 11:22:16 +0530 Page 1 of 2 06-WP-16541-2024.DOC 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the Respondent, both the Writ Petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. 4. We make it clear that this order would not come in the way of the Petitioner(s) to make an application before the learned Tribunal for withdrawal of amount, in accordance with law.

(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { Page 2 of 2