73-WP-6057-2024 (C).doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6057 OF 2024 Leo Inas Augustine Rebello S/o. Sacrament Rebello ...Petitioner VERSUS Evita Rebello D/o. Rudolf D Souza ...Respondent ____________________________________________________________ Mr.Vinay M. Bhate, for the Petitioner (Through V.C.). NILAM None, for the Respondent.NILAM DigitallybySANTOSHsignedSANTOSH KAMBLE ____________________________________________________________KAMBLE Date:12:12:362026.08.25+0530 CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 24th AUGUST 2026 P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. None present for the Respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Petition and submit that the learned Family Court has allowed the Petitioner’s Application to lead the evidence through Video Conferencing, but Family Court has not providing link for that purpose. Hence, direction be given to the Family Court to provide the link. 3. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Family Court if allowed the Application for leading the evidence through Video Conferencing, the Family Court shall provide the link to the Petitioner, and the matter is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. 4. All pending Applications are disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Page 1 of 1

73-WP-6057-2024 (C).doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6057 OF 2024 Leo Inas Augustine Rebello S/o. Sacrament Rebello ...Petitioner VERSUS Evita Rebello D/o. Rudolf D Souza ...Respondent ____________________________________________________________ Mr.Vinay M. Bhate, for the Petitioner (Through V.C.). NILAM None, for the Respondent.NILAM DigitallybySANTOSHsignedSANTOSH KAMBLE ____________________________________________________________KAMBLE Date:12:12:362026.08.25+0530 CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 24th AUGUST 2026 P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. None present for the Respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Petition and submit that the learned Family Court has allowed the Petitioner’s Application to lead the evidence through Video Conferencing, but Family Court has not providing link for that purpose. Hence, direction be given to the Family Court to provide the link. 3. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Family Court if allowed the Application for leading the evidence through Video Conferencing, the Family Court shall provide the link to the Petitioner, and the matter is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of. 4. All pending Applications are disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Page 1 of 1