2026:BHC-NAG:10842-DB (1) 104-wp-966-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 966 OF 2022 (Late Raghobaji Bachale Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Wardha and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Singh h/f S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the Petitioner (s). Mr. N.R. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, due to passage of time, the reliefs sought in the petition have been rendered infructuous. Hence, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) MPBalekar

2026:BHC-NAG:10842-DB (1) 104-wp-966-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 966 OF 2022 (Late Raghobaji Bachale Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Wardha and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Singh h/f S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the Petitioner (s). Mr. N.R. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, due to passage of time, the reliefs sought in the petition have been rendered infructuous. Hence, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) MPBalekar