15.WP.2198.2024+.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) ININ THETHE HIGHHIGH COURTCOURT OFOF JUDICATUREJUDICATURE ATAT BOMBAYBOMBAY CRIMINALCRIMINAL APPELLATEAPPELLATE JURISDICTIONJURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2198 OF 2024 Nilesh Vikram Gavad and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4145OF 2026 Sachin Pralhad Gavai and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents ....................  Mr. Prashant Pandey a/w. Mr. Dinesh Jadhwani and Ms. Ridhima Mangovkar, Advocates i/by W3Legal LLP for Petitioners.  Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.  Mr. Tushar N. Halwai, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : AUGUST 27, 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Pandey, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Mr. Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and Mr. Halwai, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. 2. As informed by learned Advocates, costs have been paid as directed vide order dated 20.08.2026 and the same order stands complied with. 3. Hence no further orders are required to be passed. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 1 of 1 HARSHADA DigitallyHARSHADAHANUMANTsigned by HANUMANT SAWANT SAWANT Date:14:53:572026.08.27+0530

15.WP.2198.2024+.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) ININ THETHE HIGHHIGH COURTCOURT OFOF JUDICATUREJUDICATURE ATAT BOMBAYBOMBAY CRIMINALCRIMINAL APPELLATEAPPELLATE JURISDICTIONJURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2198 OF 2024 Nilesh Vikram Gavad and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4145OF 2026 Sachin Pralhad Gavai and Ors. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents ....................  Mr. Prashant Pandey a/w. Mr. Dinesh Jadhwani and Ms. Ridhima Mangovkar, Advocates i/by W3Legal LLP for Petitioners.  Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.  Mr. Tushar N. Halwai, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : AUGUST 27, 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Pandey, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Mr. Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and Mr. Halwai, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2. 2. As informed by learned Advocates, costs have been paid as directed vide order dated 20.08.2026 and the same order stands complied with. 3. Hence no further orders are required to be passed. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 1 of 1 HARSHADA DigitallyHARSHADAHANUMANTsigned by HANUMANT SAWANT SAWANT Date:14:53:572026.08.27+0530