Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND 5-apeal-1296-25.odt SADANAND SHERLA SHERLA Date: 2026.08.20 18:15:44 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1296 OF 2025 J.S. Building Material Suppliers Private Limited …Appellant V/s. 1. Preetam Satya Narayan Kabra Proprietor of Jyoti Enterprises 2. State of Maharashtra ...Respondents. ………….. None present for the Appellant. Mr. V.N. Sagare, APP for the Respondent/State. ………….. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 20.08.2026. P.C. : 1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 17th December 2019 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 56th Court, At Sewree, Mumbai in C.C.No.5606331/SS/2019. 2. By the impugned judgment and order, the learned Magistrate has acquitted respondent No.1 herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. No steps are taken to serve respondent No.1/original accused. 4. Even on the previous date of hearing, i.e. 4th August 2026 none appeared for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. The Appeal is thus dismissed for want of prosecution. [N.R.BORKAR, J.] Dinesh S. Sherla 1/1

Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND 5-apeal-1296-25.odt SADANAND SHERLA SHERLA Date: 2026.08.20 18:15:44 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1296 OF 2025 J.S. Building Material Suppliers Private Limited …Appellant V/s. 1. Preetam Satya Narayan Kabra Proprietor of Jyoti Enterprises 2. State of Maharashtra ...Respondents. ………….. None present for the Appellant. Mr. V.N. Sagare, APP for the Respondent/State. ………….. CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 20.08.2026. P.C. : 1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 17th December 2019 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 56th Court, At Sewree, Mumbai in C.C.No.5606331/SS/2019. 2. By the impugned judgment and order, the learned Magistrate has acquitted respondent No.1 herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. No steps are taken to serve respondent No.1/original accused. 4. Even on the previous date of hearing, i.e. 4th August 2026 none appeared for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. The Appeal is thus dismissed for want of prosecution. [N.R.BORKAR, J.] Dinesh S. Sherla 1/1