902 WP-2206-2019 (C).doc IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2206 OF 2019 Smt. Tejaswini Prashant Gaidole & Ors. …… Petitioner VERSUS State of Maharashtra & Ors. …… Respondents ... Ms. Bhargavi Patil a/w Mr. Neev Patil i/by Adv. Meelan S. Topkar, Advocates for Petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, Additional Government Pleader a/w Mr. Santosh A. Jadhav, ‘B’ Panel Counsel, AGP for the Respondent-State. ... CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 19 AUGUST 2026. P. C. : 1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner is challenging the impugned Judgment and Order dated 13 October, 2014, passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai, in Original Application No. 1014 of 2013. 2. Rule. By consent of the parties the Petition is taken up for hearing. 3. Learned AGP has tendered a letter dated 18 August, 2026, addressed by the Deputy Director, Health Services, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur, to the Government Pleader, High Court, Circuit Bench at Shubham 1 902 WP-2206-2019 (C).doc Kolhapur, along with the relevant annexures thereto. The said letter dated 18 August, 2026, is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 4. For ease of reference a scan copy of the said letter is reproduced herein above: 5. Taking into consideration the letter tendered by the learned AGP along with its annexures, it would suffice the cause, to make the Rule Shubham 2

902 WP-2206-2019 (C).doc absolute and allow the prayer made by the Petitioner in Original Application No. 1014 of 2013. 6. The Petition stands allowed in terms of prayer clause 9(a) of Original Application No. 1014 of 2013. The said prayer reads as under: “9. (a) By a suitable order, this Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to hold and declare that the promotion of the Petitioners effected in May-June 2007 by the Respondents is a regular promotion in the post of Sister Tutor from the post of Staff Nurse and accordingly, the Petitioners be granted all the consequential service benefits.” 7. Rule is made absolute. 8. The Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Digitally signed by TALLE TALLE SHUBHAM SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO ASHOKRAO Date: 2026.08.20 14:03:07 +0530 Shubham 3

902 WP-2206-2019 (C).doc IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2206 OF 2019 Smt. Tejaswini Prashant Gaidole & Ors. …… Petitioner VERSUS State of Maharashtra & Ors. …… Respondents ... Ms. Bhargavi Patil a/w Mr. Neev Patil i/by Adv. Meelan S. Topkar, Advocates for Petitioner. Mr. A. I. Patel, Additional Government Pleader a/w Mr. Santosh A. Jadhav, ‘B’ Panel Counsel, AGP for the Respondent-State. ... CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 19 AUGUST 2026. P. C. : 1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner is challenging the impugned Judgment and Order dated 13 October, 2014, passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai, in Original Application No. 1014 of 2013. 2. Rule. By consent of the parties the Petition is taken up for hearing. 3. Learned AGP has tendered a letter dated 18 August, 2026, addressed by the Deputy Director, Health Services, Kolhapur Division, Kolhapur, to the Government Pleader, High Court, Circuit Bench at Shubham 1 902 WP-2206-2019 (C).doc Kolhapur, along with the relevant annexures thereto. The said letter dated 18 August, 2026, is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 4. For ease of reference a scan copy of the said letter is reproduced herein above: 5. Taking into consideration the letter tendered by the learned AGP along with its annexures, it would suffice the cause, to make the Rule Shubham 2

902 WP-2206-2019 (C).doc absolute and allow the prayer made by the Petitioner in Original Application No. 1014 of 2013. 6. The Petition stands allowed in terms of prayer clause 9(a) of Original Application No. 1014 of 2013. The said prayer reads as under: “9. (a) By a suitable order, this Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to hold and declare that the promotion of the Petitioners effected in May-June 2007 by the Respondents is a regular promotion in the post of Sister Tutor from the post of Staff Nurse and accordingly, the Petitioners be granted all the consequential service benefits.” 7. Rule is made absolute. 8. The Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Digitally signed by TALLE TALLE SHUBHAM SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO ASHOKRAO Date: 2026.08.20 14:03:07 +0530 Shubham 3