2026:BHC-AS:34426 905 wp 10455 of 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10455 OF 2026 Modern Education Society ... Petitioner versus Manohar Kacharu Sanap and Anr. … Respondents Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar with Ms. Raufa Shaikh i/by Mr. Akshay R. Kulkarni, for Petitioner. Mr. Akshay Karlekar, for Respondent No.1. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 19 AUGUST 2026 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to an order dated 27 July 2026, whereby the learned Presiding Officer, University Tribunal, Pune, has stayed the order dated 17 July 2026 of termination of the services of the Respondent No.1 – Appellant in Appeal No.16 of 2026 before the Tribunal, till the final decision of the appeal. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Petitioner, the Respondent No.1 may join his service. However, the legal consequences of reinstatement shall be subject to the outcome of the Appeal. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Writ Petition stands disposed SSP 1/2 905 wp 10455 of 2026.doc with a clarification that the incident of reinstatement shall be subject to the outcome of the appeal before the University Tribunal. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 2/2 Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/08/2026 18:48:53

2026:BHC-AS:34426 905 wp 10455 of 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10455 OF 2026 Modern Education Society ... Petitioner versus Manohar Kacharu Sanap and Anr. … Respondents Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar with Ms. Raufa Shaikh i/by Mr. Akshay R. Kulkarni, for Petitioner. Mr. Akshay Karlekar, for Respondent No.1. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 19 AUGUST 2026 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to an order dated 27 July 2026, whereby the learned Presiding Officer, University Tribunal, Pune, has stayed the order dated 17 July 2026 of termination of the services of the Respondent No.1 – Appellant in Appeal No.16 of 2026 before the Tribunal, till the final decision of the appeal. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Petitioner, the Respondent No.1 may join his service. However, the legal consequences of reinstatement shall be subject to the outcome of the Appeal. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Writ Petition stands disposed SSP 1/2 905 wp 10455 of 2026.doc with a clarification that the incident of reinstatement shall be subject to the outcome of the appeal before the University Tribunal. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 2/2 Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/08/2026 18:48:53