2026:BHC-AUG:35011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1821 OF 2024 Sitaram Rabhaji Wanve VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Mr. K. N. Shermale, Advocate for applicant Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for respondent-State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Learned Counsel for the applicant makes a statement that after filing of charge sheet, regular bail has been granted to the applicant on his appearance before the trial Court. 2. Learned APP opposed the application however he does not dispute aforestated fact. 3. In view of the above, there is no justification not to confirm interim relief. 4. Application stands allowed by confirming interim relief granted by order dated 23.10.2024 except Clause No. (ii). (R. M. JOSHI, J.) B. S. Joshi 937-ABA-1821-2024.odt 1 of 1

2026:BHC-AUG:35011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1821 OF 2024 Sitaram Rabhaji Wanve VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Mr. K. N. Shermale, Advocate for applicant Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for respondent-State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Learned Counsel for the applicant makes a statement that after filing of charge sheet, regular bail has been granted to the applicant on his appearance before the trial Court. 2. Learned APP opposed the application however he does not dispute aforestated fact. 3. In view of the above, there is no justification not to confirm interim relief. 4. Application stands allowed by confirming interim relief granted by order dated 23.10.2024 except Clause No. (ii). (R. M. JOSHI, J.) B. S. Joshi 937-ABA-1821-2024.odt 1 of 1