2026:BHC-AUG:31474-DB 1 22-CA 6819-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6819 OF 2026 IN WP/676/2020 Ramkisan Balasaheb Patil Through L.Rs. Chandrakant Ramkisan Patil And Others .. Applicants Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Respondents Mr. N. B. Bhosale, Advocate h/f Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, AGP for Respondent No. 1. Mr. A. D. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. S.T. Chalikwar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ. DATE : 27th JULY, 2026. PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned advocate for respondents. 2. This civil application is filed seeking restoration of the writ petition which was dismissed in default by conditional order dated 24.03.2026. The applicants could not remove the office objections within two weeks as per the said order. While filing this application there is delay of 60 days caused in filing this 2 22-CA 6819-2026.odt application. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, delay stands condoned. The civil application is allowed. The writ petition stands restored to its original position. 4. Office to allow the applicants to remove office objections within two weeks from today. 5. The civil application stands disposed of. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) P.S.B.

2026:BHC-AUG:31474-DB 1 22-CA 6819-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6819 OF 2026 IN WP/676/2020 Ramkisan Balasaheb Patil Through L.Rs. Chandrakant Ramkisan Patil And Others .. Applicants Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Respondents Mr. N. B. Bhosale, Advocate h/f Mr. V. D. Salunke, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, AGP for Respondent No. 1. Mr. A. D. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr. S.T. Chalikwar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ. DATE : 27th JULY, 2026. PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned advocate for the applicants and learned advocate for respondents. 2. This civil application is filed seeking restoration of the writ petition which was dismissed in default by conditional order dated 24.03.2026. The applicants could not remove the office objections within two weeks as per the said order. While filing this application there is delay of 60 days caused in filing this 2 22-CA 6819-2026.odt application. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, delay stands condoned. The civil application is allowed. The writ petition stands restored to its original position. 4. Office to allow the applicants to remove office objections within two weeks from today. 5. The civil application stands disposed of. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) P.S.B.