2026:BHC-AS:31345 21 wp 5642 of 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5642 OF 2026 Sarvapriya Leasing Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner versus Mumbai District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Ors. … Respondents Mr. Shanay Shah with Mr. Darshan Mehta, Mr. Aaditya Mapara i/by Dhruve Liladhar and Co., for Petitioner. Mr. Omar Khaiyam Shaikh with Mr. Sahil Salvi, Mr. Shahzad Ansari, Mr. Zimam Khan i/by Mr. Vikas Salvi and Associates, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Parth Choudhary i/by Mr. Nishant Vyas, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Ankur Shah with Mr. Akshay Udeshi, for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 27 JULY 2026 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. When the Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the Petition, Mr. Shah the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Petitioner has filed an application seeking amendment in the plaint so as to seek impleadment of the parties and raise additional grounds of challenge and even assail the subsequent transactions. Learned Counsel submits that the impugned order may not be considered as an impediment in prosecuting the said application for amendment. 3. The Writ Petition stands disposed with a clarification that the impugned SSP 1/2 21 wp 5642 of 2026.doc order will not preclude consideration of the application for amendment, on its own merits and in accordance with law. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 2/2

Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 31/07/2026 10:54:01

2026:BHC-AS:31345 21 wp 5642 of 2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5642 OF 2026 Sarvapriya Leasing Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner versus Mumbai District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Ors. … Respondents Mr. Shanay Shah with Mr. Darshan Mehta, Mr. Aaditya Mapara i/by Dhruve Liladhar and Co., for Petitioner. Mr. Omar Khaiyam Shaikh with Mr. Sahil Salvi, Mr. Shahzad Ansari, Mr. Zimam Khan i/by Mr. Vikas Salvi and Associates, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Parth Choudhary i/by Mr. Nishant Vyas, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Ankur Shah with Mr. Akshay Udeshi, for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 27 JULY 2026 P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. When the Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the Petition, Mr. Shah the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Petitioner has filed an application seeking amendment in the plaint so as to seek impleadment of the parties and raise additional grounds of challenge and even assail the subsequent transactions. Learned Counsel submits that the impugned order may not be considered as an impediment in prosecuting the said application for amendment. 3. The Writ Petition stands disposed with a clarification that the impugned SSP 1/2 21 wp 5642 of 2026.doc order will not preclude consideration of the application for amendment, on its own merits and in accordance with law. ( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 2/2

Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 31/07/2026 10:54:01