944 CA NO. 9915 OF 2018.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9915 OF 2018 IN FAST/21435/2018 Mahadevrao Dattatray Kadam VERSUS Satish Madhavrao Kadam And Anr ... Mr. Darandale Abhijit C., Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. N. Pagare, Advocate for Respondent No.2 …. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 02.07.2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 18 days caused in filing the first appeal. 3. The learned Advocate for respondent No.2 strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence, the following order: 1 of 2 (( 2 )) 944 CA NO. 9915 OF 2018 ::ORDER:: a. Civil Application is allowed. b. The delay of 18 days caused in filing the first appeal is condoned. FIRST APPEAL 1. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 24.09.2026. 2. Learned Advocate Mr. S. N. Pagare waives service of notice for Respondent No.2. 3. Learned Advocate for the appellant seeks leave to serve respondent No.1 by private mode, in addition to the regular mode of service. 4. Leave granted. Call Record and Proceedings. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2

944 CA NO. 9915 OF 2018.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9915 OF 2018 IN FAST/21435/2018 Mahadevrao Dattatray Kadam VERSUS Satish Madhavrao Kadam And Anr ... Mr. Darandale Abhijit C., Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. N. Pagare, Advocate for Respondent No.2 …. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 02.07.2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 18 days caused in filing the first appeal. 3. The learned Advocate for respondent No.2 strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence, the following order: 1 of 2 (( 2 )) 944 CA NO. 9915 OF 2018 ::ORDER:: a. Civil Application is allowed. b. The delay of 18 days caused in filing the first appeal is condoned. FIRST APPEAL 1. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 24.09.2026. 2. Learned Advocate Mr. S. N. Pagare waives service of notice for Respondent No.2. 3. Learned Advocate for the appellant seeks leave to serve respondent No.1 by private mode, in addition to the regular mode of service. 4. Leave granted. Call Record and Proceedings. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2