2026:BHC-AUG:24894 984 to 987.odt (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 984 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2351 OF 2026 IN FAST/4701/2026 Rukminibai W/o. Sakharam Mhaske And Ors. VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. A.H. Koralkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Sangle Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. Sunita D. Shelke AND 985 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2353 OF 2026 IN FAST/4714/2026 Devidas S/o. Bajirao Mhaske. VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.S. Hoke Patil Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar AND 986 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2357 OF 2026 IN FAST/4791/2026 Dharyabhu @ Darebhau Rambhau Kakade Since Deceased Through L.rs. Limbabai Dharybhu Kakade VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Jalna And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.P. Sonpawale Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar AND 987 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2360 OF 2026 IN FAST/4605/2026 Asaram S/o. Bapurao Mhaske VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. R.K. Ingole Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar 984 to 987.odt (2) ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : JUNE 25, 2026 PER COURT :-

1. Heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties. 2. Considering submissions advanced and reasons as stated in applications, it can be observed that applicants are litigating for getting just compensation towards acquired land. Due to financial duress and lack of knowledge regarding Court procedure, appeals could to be filed within time. In this backdrop, considering length of delay, applications can be allowed by putting certain conditions. 3. In result, applications are allowed. The delay caused in filing appeals is condoned, subject to condition that applicants shall furnish an undertaking with Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that they shall not claim interest and statutory benefits for delayed period, in case first appeals are allowed thereby enhancing compensation. 4. Such undertakings be filed within a period of four weeks from today. (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) Mujaheed//

2026:BHC-AUG:24894 984 to 987.odt (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 984 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2351 OF 2026 IN FAST/4701/2026 Rukminibai W/o. Sakharam Mhaske And Ors. VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. A.H. Koralkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Sangle Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ms. Sunita D. Shelke AND 985 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2353 OF 2026 IN FAST/4714/2026 Devidas S/o. Bajirao Mhaske. VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.S. Hoke Patil Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar AND 986 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2357 OF 2026 IN FAST/4791/2026 Dharyabhu @ Darebhau Rambhau Kakade Since Deceased Through L.rs. Limbabai Dharybhu Kakade VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Jalna And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.P. Sonpawale Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar AND 987 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2360 OF 2026 IN FAST/4605/2026 Asaram S/o. Bapurao Mhaske VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Ors. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.H. Koralkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. R.K. Ingole Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.T. Chalikwar 984 to 987.odt (2) ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : JUNE 25, 2026 PER COURT :-

1. Heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties. 2. Considering submissions advanced and reasons as stated in applications, it can be observed that applicants are litigating for getting just compensation towards acquired land. Due to financial duress and lack of knowledge regarding Court procedure, appeals could to be filed within time. In this backdrop, considering length of delay, applications can be allowed by putting certain conditions. 3. In result, applications are allowed. The delay caused in filing appeals is condoned, subject to condition that applicants shall furnish an undertaking with Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that they shall not claim interest and statutory benefits for delayed period, in case first appeals are allowed thereby enhancing compensation. 4. Such undertakings be filed within a period of four weeks from today. (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) Mujaheed//