908-CA-4889-2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4889 OF 2020 IN FAST/9482/2019 Datta S/o Shamrao Sakalkar VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ….. Mr. Jadhav Kailas B, Advocate for Applicant Ms. M. L. Sangit, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 25.06.2026 PER COURT : 1. This is an Application for condonation of delay of 846 days in preferring the First Appeal by the Original Claimant. 2. The learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 is present. 3. None for Respondent No.3 – Acquiring Body, though served. 4. For the reasons mentioned in the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause – ‘B’. 5. The Applicant shall not be entitled for the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 6. A copy of this order shall be placed with the Appeal Memo. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/June-2026 1

908-CA-4889-2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4889 OF 2020 IN FAST/9482/2019 Datta S/o Shamrao Sakalkar VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ….. Mr. Jadhav Kailas B, Advocate for Applicant Ms. M. L. Sangit, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 ….. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 25.06.2026 PER COURT : 1. This is an Application for condonation of delay of 846 days in preferring the First Appeal by the Original Claimant. 2. The learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 is present. 3. None for Respondent No.3 – Acquiring Body, though served. 4. For the reasons mentioned in the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clause – ‘B’. 5. The Applicant shall not be entitled for the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 6. A copy of this order shall be placed with the Appeal Memo. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] Sameer/June-2026 1