14. FA 892-1997.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 892 OF 1997 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5659 OF 1997 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 892 OF 1997 Shri K. V. Ambu Kunhi ..Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay ..Respondent None for the Appellant/Applicant Mr. Pradeep Patil a/w. Ms. Pallavi Khale i/b. Ms. Komal Punjabi, Advocates, for the Respondent - MCGM CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 2 JULY, 2026 P. C. 1. None appears for the Appellant/Applicant when the matter is called out. 2. On the last occasion i. e. on 25 June, 2026, none appeared for the Appellant and the following Order was passed. “1. None appears for the Appellant/Applicant when the matter is called out. 2. Ms. Khale, learned Counsel for the Respondent -Corporation submits that this proceeding arises out of the notices issued under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. 3. Let this matter come up on board on 2 July, 2026 under the caption “For Dismissal”.” Anand 1 of 2 14. FA 892-1997.doc 3. From the record, it can be seen that the law firm by name M/s. Bhaishankar Kanga and Girdharlal used to represent the Appellant/Applicant. Registry has informed this Court that the said Law Firm is no more into active practice. 4. Issue notice to the Appellant/Applicant returnable on 27 August, 2026. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Anand 2 of 2

14. FA 892-1997.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 892 OF 1997 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5659 OF 1997 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 892 OF 1997 Shri K. V. Ambu Kunhi ..Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay ..Respondent None for the Appellant/Applicant Mr. Pradeep Patil a/w. Ms. Pallavi Khale i/b. Ms. Komal Punjabi, Advocates, for the Respondent - MCGM CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 2 JULY, 2026 P. C. 1. None appears for the Appellant/Applicant when the matter is called out. 2. On the last occasion i. e. on 25 June, 2026, none appeared for the Appellant and the following Order was passed. “1. None appears for the Appellant/Applicant when the matter is called out. 2. Ms. Khale, learned Counsel for the Respondent -Corporation submits that this proceeding arises out of the notices issued under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. 3. Let this matter come up on board on 2 July, 2026 under the caption “For Dismissal”.” Anand 1 of 2 14. FA 892-1997.doc 3. From the record, it can be seen that the law firm by name M/s. Bhaishankar Kanga and Girdharlal used to represent the Appellant/Applicant. Registry has informed this Court that the said Law Firm is no more into active practice. 4. Issue notice to the Appellant/Applicant returnable on 27 August, 2026. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Anand 2 of 2