1 / 2 356.fa527.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO. 527 OF 2012 VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, BULDHANE ... Appellant VS. PREMSUKH MOTILAL KHATRI (DEAD) THR. LRS. GP KHATI AND ORS. …. Respondents Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for appellant. Mr. H.D. Dubey, AGP for respondent/State. Mr. N.B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 17.06.2026 PC : The appeal is filed by the appellant – VIDC, Chikhali, Buldana, thereby challenging the judgment dated 24.09.2010, passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Buldhana. 2. At the outset, Mr. Patil, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the matter is covered by virtue of the Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016 and corrigendum dated 13.08.2018, whereby it has been directed not to prefer an appeal, if the enhanced rate is less than four times the rate awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. Prity 2 / 2 356.fa527.2012 3. Statement is accepted. 4. In view of the aforesaid Government Resolution and Corrigendum, the appeal stands disposed of. [ SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ] Prity

1 / 2 356.fa527.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO. 527 OF 2012 VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, BULDHANE ... Appellant VS. PREMSUKH MOTILAL KHATRI (DEAD) THR. LRS. GP KHATI AND ORS. …. Respondents Mr. P.B. Patil, Advocate for appellant. Mr. H.D. Dubey, AGP for respondent/State. Mr. N.B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 17.06.2026 PC : The appeal is filed by the appellant – VIDC, Chikhali, Buldana, thereby challenging the judgment dated 24.09.2010, passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Buldhana. 2. At the outset, Mr. Patil, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the matter is covered by virtue of the Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016 and corrigendum dated 13.08.2018, whereby it has been directed not to prefer an appeal, if the enhanced rate is less than four times the rate awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. Prity 2 / 2 356.fa527.2012 3. Statement is accepted. 4. In view of the aforesaid Government Resolution and Corrigendum, the appeal stands disposed of. [ SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ] Prity