53 & 64.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 838 OF 2025 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1967 OF 2025 Infinity Fincorp Solutions Pvt. Ltd. … Applicant V/s. Banshidhar Nathu … Respondent AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7305 OF 2025 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 2051 OF 2025 …. Ms. Vedika Pedhambkar i/b. Akhil Modi & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. …. CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 16th June, 2026 PC:- 1. When these matters are called out, Ms. Pedhambkar, learned Counsel, appearing for the Applicant submits that in these matters there has been a unilateral appointment of Arbitrator and this Court may pass appropriate orders in view of the decision in the case of Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs. Airports Authority of India1 , where the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clearly observed that 1 2026 SCC Online SC 7 Mandar M. 1/2 53 & 64.doc unilateral appointment of arbitrator is void ab initio and the ineligibility can be raised at any stage and even in execution. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the respective awards are therefore set aside and the Execution Applications as well as the connected Interim Applications stand dismissed/disposed. 3. It would be open to the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law.

4. As far as limitation is concerned, the period from the invocation of the arbitration till today be excluded in initiating fresh arbitration proceedings. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Mandar M. 2/2

53 & 64.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 838 OF 2025 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1967 OF 2025 Infinity Fincorp Solutions Pvt. Ltd. … Applicant V/s. Banshidhar Nathu … Respondent AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7305 OF 2025 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 2051 OF 2025 …. Ms. Vedika Pedhambkar i/b. Akhil Modi & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. …. CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 16th June, 2026 PC:- 1. When these matters are called out, Ms. Pedhambkar, learned Counsel, appearing for the Applicant submits that in these matters there has been a unilateral appointment of Arbitrator and this Court may pass appropriate orders in view of the decision in the case of Bhadra International (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others vs. Airports Authority of India1 , where the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clearly observed that 1 2026 SCC Online SC 7 Mandar M. 1/2 53 & 64.doc unilateral appointment of arbitrator is void ab initio and the ineligibility can be raised at any stage and even in execution. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the respective awards are therefore set aside and the Execution Applications as well as the connected Interim Applications stand dismissed/disposed. 3. It would be open to the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law.

4. As far as limitation is concerned, the period from the invocation of the arbitration till today be excluded in initiating fresh arbitration proceedings. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Mandar M. 2/2