Subhash Kashinath Patil v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

IA/1716/2026

Decision date: 2026-06-16
Text availability: Full text
Judges: Amit Borkar

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

37-fast-34450-25 with connected matters.doc MPBalekar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 34450 OF 2025 Nathu Joma Patil (Since Deceased Thr Lrs.) And Ors. … Appellant V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1715 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1716 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1717 OF 2026 Mr. Kaustubh Patil a/w Roshan Sawant for the appellant / applicant. Mr. A.R. Patil, Addl. G.P., for the State. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JUNE 16, 2026 P.C.: INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1715 OF 2026 1. The claimant is seeking condonation of delay of 437 days in filing the present appeal arising out of award passed by the Reference Court. The present appeal is for enhancement of awarded amount. Therefore, considering the reasons assigned in the application, the interim application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 1 37-fast-34450-25 with connected matters.doc INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1717 OF 2026 2. For the reasons stated in the interim application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). 3. Necessary amendment be carried out within four weeks from today. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1716 OF 2026 4. Since the application is to bring legal heirs of claimants, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). 5. Necessary amendment be carried out within four weeks from today. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2