54-CP-484-2025.DOC Ajit Pathrikar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7452 OF 2025 Aniruddha Uttam Shevlekar ...Petitioner Versus Deepak Jaywant Mhetre And Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7452 OF 2025 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7452 OF 2025 Mr. Dropad Patil a/w Amit Karle and Sameer Tiwari, for the Petitioner in CP/484/2025 and for Respondent in WP/7452/2025. Mr. Devidas G. Bhoir i/b Pandit Kasar, for Respondent No.1. Ms. D. S. Deshmukh, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATED: 15th JUNE 2026 PC:- 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Respondent No.1 has expired. Having examined the Contempt Petition, the allegation is purely against Respondent No.1, Page 1 of 2 15th June 2026 54-CP-484-2025.DOC who had allegedly made erroneous submissions before the Circle Officer. The Contempt Petition would not survive after demise of Respondent No.1. 2. The present Petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly. 3. All other legal proceedings as available before the Circle Officer to go on. (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) Page 2 of 2 15th June 2026

54-CP-484-2025.DOC Ajit Pathrikar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7452 OF 2025 Aniruddha Uttam Shevlekar ...Petitioner Versus Deepak Jaywant Mhetre And Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7452 OF 2025 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7452 OF 2025 Mr. Dropad Patil a/w Amit Karle and Sameer Tiwari, for the Petitioner in CP/484/2025 and for Respondent in WP/7452/2025. Mr. Devidas G. Bhoir i/b Pandit Kasar, for Respondent No.1. Ms. D. S. Deshmukh, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATED: 15th JUNE 2026 PC:- 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that Respondent No.1 has expired. Having examined the Contempt Petition, the allegation is purely against Respondent No.1, Page 1 of 2 15th June 2026 54-CP-484-2025.DOC who had allegedly made erroneous submissions before the Circle Officer. The Contempt Petition would not survive after demise of Respondent No.1. 2. The present Petition is dismissed and disposed of accordingly. 3. All other legal proceedings as available before the Circle Officer to go on. (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) Page 2 of 2 15th June 2026