HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV H.C. SHIV 4.ba2544.25.doc Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2026.06.12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 11:01:53 +0300 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2544 OF 2025 Vickykumar Sahebsah Gupta …. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent Mr. Mithilesh Mishra with N. Bhanushali with Rushan Balsara for the Applicant. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Mahesh Mule, Spl. P. P. with Nidhi Narwekar for the Respondent. Mr. Rupesh Patil, API, DCB CID, Mumbai present. CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 11th JUNE, 2026 P.C. :- 1) Mr. Mule, learned Special P. P. submitted that the trial in the subject matter crime has already commenced. Till date, the prosecution has examined three witnesses. The prosecution will complete the examination of all material witnesses within one year from today and conclude the trial. 2) In view thereof, Mr. Mishra, the learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Application with liberty to renew the prayer for bail if the prosecution fails to examine the material witnesses and conclude the trial within one year as aforesaid. 3) Leave to withdraw is granted. 4) Application is disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 5) It is made clear that the instant Bail Application is not heard on merits. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) 1/1

HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV H.C. SHIV 4.ba2544.25.doc Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date: 2026.06.12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 11:01:53 +0300 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2544 OF 2025 Vickykumar Sahebsah Gupta …. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent Mr. Mithilesh Mishra with N. Bhanushali with Rushan Balsara for the Applicant. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Mahesh Mule, Spl. P. P. with Nidhi Narwekar for the Respondent. Mr. Rupesh Patil, API, DCB CID, Mumbai present. CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 11th JUNE, 2026 P.C. :- 1) Mr. Mule, learned Special P. P. submitted that the trial in the subject matter crime has already commenced. Till date, the prosecution has examined three witnesses. The prosecution will complete the examination of all material witnesses within one year from today and conclude the trial. 2) In view thereof, Mr. Mishra, the learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Application with liberty to renew the prayer for bail if the prosecution fails to examine the material witnesses and conclude the trial within one year as aforesaid. 3) Leave to withdraw is granted. 4) Application is disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 5) It is made clear that the instant Bail Application is not heard on merits. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) 1/1