2026:BHC-AUG:22724 1 945.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 945 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10416 OF 2025 IN FAST/26617/2025 KAVITA AJABSIGH PATIL VERSUS GANESH BHURAJI GOPAL AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav M. Bhokarikar. Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Abhijit Chudhari. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 10th June, 2026. P.C.: 1 This is an application for condonation of delay of 167 days caused in filing the first appeal. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for respondent No.3. Perused the application. 3 The learned counsel for respondent No.3 strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4 On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. 5 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. The appeal be registered. 2 945.odt Appeal : 6 Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 7th August, 2026. Mr. Abhijit Chudhari, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of respondent No.3. 7 Call for record and proceedings. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga

2026:BHC-AUG:22724 1 945.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 945 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10416 OF 2025 IN FAST/26617/2025 KAVITA AJABSIGH PATIL VERSUS GANESH BHURAJI GOPAL AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav M. Bhokarikar. Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Abhijit Chudhari. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 10th June, 2026. P.C.: 1 This is an application for condonation of delay of 167 days caused in filing the first appeal. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for respondent No.3. Perused the application. 3 The learned counsel for respondent No.3 strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4 On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. 5 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. The appeal be registered. 2 945.odt Appeal : 6 Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 7th August, 2026. Mr. Abhijit Chudhari, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of respondent No.3. 7 Call for record and proceedings. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga