Andhra Pradesh High Court
Chintha Maruthi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/29983/2025
- Decision date
- 2026-07-15
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- B S Bhanumathi
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
APHC010583002025 IN THEE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD ESH AT AMARAVATI [3311] (Special Original Jurisdiction) Thursday, the sixtteenth day of July two thousand and twwenty six Present The Hono urable Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathhi WWrit Petition No.29983 of 2025 Between: Chintha Maruthi, S/o. C. Muniswamy, Aged about 40 years,, R/o. Door No. 4/121, BB.C. Colony, Palthuru village, Vidapannakal mandal Ananthapuram districtt. …….Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principaal Secretary, Revenue Department and others. …RRespondents Counsel for the petittioner: 1.P. Saraswathi Counsel for the resppondents: 1.G.P. for Home 2.G.P. for Revenuee 3.Phani Babu Yalaamanchili 4.G.P. for Registraation & Stamps The Court made the following: 2 BSB, J W.P.No.29983 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in passing the orders in Case No. 2170 / 2025, dated 26.09.2025, for cancelling the gift deed No. 8825 of 2024, dated 03.09.2024, executed by the petitioner’s mother, without conducting proper enquiry as illegal, irregular, unjust and violation of the principles of natural justice and violation of the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Specific Performance Act, 1963 thereunder and consequently the Court may set aside / quash the impugned order in Case No. 2170 / 2025, dated 26.09.2025, and direct the respondent No. 6 to provide police protection to the petitioner and restrain the respondents Nos. 8 to 13 from interfering with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of the property in the interests of justice.” 2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she had filed a letter in the Registry requesting permission to withdraw the writ petition. 3. In view of the letter submitted by the petitioner and the submissions now made before this Court, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3 BSB, J W.P.No.29983 of 2025 There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ B. S. BHANUMATHI, J Dt.16.07.2026 RAR Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No