Andhra Pradesh High Court
Manojavam Construction LLP v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/26955/2024
- Decision date
- 2026-07-02
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Ravi Cheemalapati
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
Date of reserved for orderss : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010519882024 IN TH E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADDESH AT AMARAVATI [3332] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURAABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALLAPATI WRRIT PETITION NO: 26955/2024 Between: 1. MANOJAVAM COONSTRUCTION LLP, D.NO. 06, GONDIPALLI, NANDIMANDLAMAA, YSR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS DESIGNATED PARTNER, TAMI DALA MANOHAR REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, AGED. 43 YEARRS,OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O D.NO. 2-14, GONDIPALLE, CU DDAPAH-516218. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITTS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DDEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BU ILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DDISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITTS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GGOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECR ETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMMAN, PADA, PULIVENDULA YSRR DISTRICT, KADAPA. 4. THE SUPERINTENNDING ENGINEER, ROADS ANDD BUILDINGS, KADAPA, YSR KADDAPA (ERSTWHILE KADAPA) DISTRRICT, 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DIVISION, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA (ERSTWHILE KADAPA) DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payment an amount of Rs.31,67,630.36/- even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e, Procurement of Furniture, Wireless sound systemfor newly constructed Sabha Bhavanat Vempalli in YSR District. ,vide allotted to the Token Bill No.2024-173123, (old token bill No.2023-2611340) in vide agreement No. 1000393959/2023-24, Dated. 27-01-2024,as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payments of Rs.31,67,630.36/- with interest @12 percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of final Bill amounts Rs.31,67,630.36/- with interest @12 percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e.,Procurement of Furniture, Wireless sound systemfor newly constructed Sabha Bhavanat Vempalli in YSR District.,vide allotted to the Token Bill No.2024-173123, (old token bill No.2023-2611340) in vide agreement No. 1000393959/2023-24, Dated. 27-01-2024,pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS ORDER The writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent authorities in withholding the payment of the amount to the tune of Rs.31,67,630/- even after finalizing the bills in relation to the work i.e. “Procurement of Furniture, Wireless sound system for newly constructed Sabha Bhavant Vempalli in YSR District”. 2. Heard Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned counsel for petitioner, and Sri C.Praveen, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on counter, submitted that the authorities have admitted the balance net amount due to the petitioner at Rs. 31,67,630/- and sought four (04) months time for payment of the balance amount due.
4. Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned counsel for petitioner, reported no objection for granting time as sought for by the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the authorities concerned to pay to the petitioner the amount of Rs.31,67,630/- to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate not later than four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 3rd July, 2026 RR Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No