Allahabad High Court

Jiyalal v. State of U.P. & Ors.

WRIC/28107/2026

Decision date
2026-09-08
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Chandra Kumar Rai

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28107 of 2026 Jiyalal .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prakash Chandra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Prakash Chandra Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Azad Rai, learned Counsel for Gaon Sabha and Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-"(i) A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to set aside the Notice as R.C. No. 22 dated 29.04.2022 (Gram Sabha/Local Authority Kasaujha Urf Pure Raghai V/S Jiyalal), during the pendency of the present writ petition before this Hon'ble Court. II) A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent authorities not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner in plot in dispute i.e. Arazi no. 596 (Chh) area about 0.1172 hect. situated at Village- Kasaujha Urf Pure Raghai Police Station Sarai Mamrej, Tehsil- Handia, District- Prayagraj, and not to interfere in entry of the revenue record till the disposal of this writ petition." 3. Since the same relief has been claimed in Writ C No. 34456 of 2026 which has been disposed of by separate order dated 9.9.2026, hence the prayer made in the instant petition cannot be WRIC No. 28107 of 2026 2

entertained. 4. No interference is required in the matter. 5. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) September 9, 2026 Vandana Y. Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad