Allahabad High Court

Vakil v. Shrikishun & Anr.

A227/12410/2026

Decision date
2026-09-08
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12410 of 2026 Vakil .....Petitioner(s) Versus Shrikishun And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankur Rai, Vikalp Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 12, Gorakhpur to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C filed in Suit No. 912 of 2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that 6-C application filed by petitioner in Civil Suit No. 912 of 2026 is pending consideration and till date the same has not been decided by the court concerned. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 12, Gorakhpur to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) filed in Suit No. 912 of 2026, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)

September 9, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad