Allahabad High Court
Shahbaz @ Aman @ Shahbaz Khan v. State of U.P. thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko
NA528/2544/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-06-25
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Subhash Chandra Sharma
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2544 of 2026 Shahbaz @ Aman @ Shahbaz Khan .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jai Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application has been filed with prayer to issue a direction to the learned trial court, District Unnao to accept the two sureties in once case and treat the same for all the four criminal cases mentioned in the para no.8 in the present application related to the applicant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in this case there were four cases against the applicant in which he has already been granted bail by the courts concerned but due to unavoidable circumstances he is not in position to furnish personal bond and sureties for all the cases, therefore, request to direct the learned trial court to accept the personal bond and surety in one case treating them good in all the cases against the applicant as aforesaid in which he has already been granted bail in view of the law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad alias Mohd. Imran @ Vikki vs. State of U.P. in S.L.P. (Criminal) No.8914-8915/2018 decided on 29.10.2018.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection in this regard. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and from the perusal of record, it appears that the applicant has already been granted bail by the courts concerned in four cases as mentioned in the para no.8 of the memo of application by the applicant, therefore, in view of the law as laid NA528 No. 2544 of 2026 2 down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad alias Mohd. Imran @ Vikki vs. State of U.P. in S.L.P. (Criminal) No.8914-8915/2018 decided on 29.10.2018, the applicant will execute a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned trial court and the same personal bond and sureties shall hold good for all the four cases as mentioned in the para no.8 of the memo of application. Accordingly, this application u/s 528 B.N.S.S. is disposed of finally. June 25, 2026 Ashok Gupta (Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench