Allahabad High Court

Prinyanka & Anr. v. State of U.P. thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. & Ors.

CRLP/6116/2026

Decision date
2026-06-23
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Pankaj Bhatia, Amitabh Kumar Rai

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6116 of 2026 Prinyanka And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arshad Siddiqui, Shafaq Fatima, Vaibhav Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have prayed for issuance of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to harass the petitioner and not to interfere in the peaceful marriage life of the petitioners.

3. Petitioners claim to have married each other of their own volition and also claim that on the date of their marriage i.e. 17..06.2026, they were of marriageable age. The marriage certificate dated 17.06.2026 issued by Arya Samaj Mandir, Aliganj, Lucknow is annexed as Annexure-2 to the writ petition. Both the Petitioners have annexed their High School Marksheet, Aadhar Card and Pan card as Annexure 1 as proof of their age. He further submits that there is no F.I.R. against the petitioners and they are not wanted in any criminal case, yet the respondents are harassing them, who are not agreeable to the marriage. Therefore, this petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful married life of the petitioners. 4. Considering the fact that the petitioners are major and have solemnsed marriage, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioners to approach the respondent No. 3, who shall ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not affected by anyone including respondent No. 4. June 23, 2026 PS (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench