HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1094 of 2026 Bharat Kumar .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upendra Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Ms. Akshita Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Alok Kumar Tiwari, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Adarsh Kumar Tripathi, who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No. 547 of 2025, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Ayodhya, District Ayodhya. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 05.09.2025 against the applicant and his mother Gulab Devi in furtherance of an application under Section 175(3) BNSS. The contents of the application indicate a property dispute between the parties, although the FIR contained allegation of commission of offence under Section 467 IPC also, the same could not be established during investigation. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that civil dispute is pending between the parties and the applicant has no criminal history.

5. The learned A.G.A. states that the offences alleged carry maximum sentence of imprisonment up to 7 years and the applicant is cooperating in the investigation. NABAIL No. 1094 of 2026 2 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has no criminal history and without making any observations which may affect the outcome of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Bharat Kumar before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court'

(iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) June 18, 2026 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench