Allahabad High Court

Sunita Yadav v. State of U.P. thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. & Ors.

WRIC/4433/2026

Decision date
2026-06-12
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 4433 of 2026 Sunita Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Pathak, Mahendra Pal Chauhan, Sher Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 2 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Sri Mahendra Pal Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue the petition, therefore, it may be dismissed as not pressed. To which there is no objection by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. 2. Dismissed accordingly as not pressed. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) June 12, 2026 Akanksha Sri/- Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench